Starling Bank’s £29M Fine: Lessons in Balancing Innovation and Compliance
Written by Stephen Platt.
Starling Bank, a UK-based digital bank, has been widely regarded as a leading example of the new wave of fintechs disrupting traditional banking. However, the bank faced a significant setback recently when it was fined £29 million by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) for failings in its anti-money laundering (AML) controls. This fine is a reminder that even the most innovative and forward-thinking financial institutions must adhere to fundamental regulatory standards.
What Went Wrong at Starling Bank?
Starling Bank’s troubles centred on deficiencies in its AML and counter-terrorism financing (CTF) measures. According to regulatory findings, the bank was found to have severe lapses in key areas, which left it vulnerable to exploitation by criminals. These lapses occurred despite the bank being fully aware of regulatory expectations and having the necessary resources to address these issues.
Key Areas of Failure
- Customer Due Diligence (CDD) and Know Your Customer (KYC) Failures
The FCA found that Starling Bank failed to implement robust CDD measures, which are critical in identifying and verifying the identities of customers. Customers were only screened every 14 days and only after they were onboarded. KYC processes are designed to prevent financial institutions from dealing with high-risk individuals and entities involved in criminal activities, such as money laundering or terrorism financing. Starling Bank, however, was found to have gaps in its CDD processes, failing to flag and investigate suspicious customers adequately. - Inadequate Transaction Monitoring
The bank’s systems for monitoring customer transactions for signs of money laundering or other suspicious activity were found to be inadequate. The FCA indicated that the bank’s automated monitoring systems had significant shortcomings in flagging potentially illicit activities, which enabled suspect transactions to pass through the bank undetected. An effective transaction monitoring system is crucial in preventing and detecting suspicious financial behaviour, yet Starling’s systems were apparently not fit for this purpose. - Staffing and Skills Deficiencies
A common issue among fintech firms is their rapid growth, which often outpaces their ability to maintain adequate regulatory and compliance structures. Starling Bank faced a similar problem, failing to equip its AML teams with the necessary expertise and resources to handle the increasing volume and complexity of its business. The bank’s exponential growth in recent years likely strained its resources, leading to under-resourced compliance departments that struggled to keep up with evolving risks. - Failure to Address Known Issues
The FCA report emphasised that the bank had been warned multiple times about its weaknesses but failed to act with sufficient urgency. The bank onboarded 54,359 accounts of 49,183 high-risk or higher-risk customers, which breached its voluntary requirement (VREQ) to not onboard any high-risk customers. Starling Bank’s senior management had the knowledge and the resources to rectify these deficiencies but did not prioritise them effectively. This points to a lack of strong governance and accountability at the highest levels of the organisation. - Overreliance on Automated Systems
Starling Bank, like many digital banks, employed automated systems extensively to enhance efficiency and cost-effectiveness. However, the investigation revealed that these systems were not properly calibrated to detect risks or adequately respond to changing regulatory requirements. An over-reliance on automated systems without continuous oversight, testing, and updates creates a vulnerability to new types of fraud and financial crime.
Key Lessons for Other Banks
The fine imposed on Starling Bank provides key lessons for other financial institutions, both traditional and digital, as the banking landscape continues to evolve.
- Balancing Innovation with Regulatory Compliance
One of the primary lessons from Starling Bank’s case is the importance of balancing technological innovation with robust regulatory compliance. Starling's customer base expanded from approximately 43,000 in 2017 to 3.6 million in 2023. While fintech firms like Starling often pride themselves on their lean and agile operations, they must still maintain a comprehensive understanding of the regulatory environment. This includes being prepared for ever-evolving threats in financial crime and making proactive investments in compliance infrastructure. - Establishing a Strong Compliance Culture
Senior leadership needs to instil a culture of compliance throughout the organization. This means prioritising risk management and holding key stakeholders accountable for AML and CTF practices. Starling Bank’s failure to act upon repeated warnings indicates a disconnect between leadership and compliance teams. For other banks, this highlights the importance of creating a culture that prioritizes regulatory integrity and embeds it in decision-making at all levels. - Proactive and Scalable Compliance Systems
A critical takeaway is the necessity for scalable compliance systems that can adapt to a growing customer base and transaction volume. As banks expand, they must continuously review and upgrade their AML and CTF processes. Automated systems are essential for handling large volumes of data, but they should not be relied upon exclusively. Banks must maintain a human-in-the-loop approach to validate and improve automated systems’ efficiency in detecting and addressing suspicious activity. - Staffing and Expertise in AML and CTF
The staffing deficiencies at Starling Bank underscore the need for institutions to adequately resource their compliance teams. Banks should invest in hiring experienced compliance professionals and providing ongoing training for their employees. The complexity of financial crime is constantly evolving, and the expertise of a knowledgeable and proactive team is crucial in identifying and mitigating these threats effectively. - Implementing a Continuous Feedback Loop with Regulators
Financial institutions should establish a proactive and transparent relationship with regulators. Rather than waiting for warnings to escalate into penalties, banks should strive to engage in open dialogue, receive feedback constructively, and act decisively on identified issues. By adopting this approach, banks can avoid regulatory blind spots and continuously improve their practices. - Testing and Auditing Automated Systems Regularly
Banks that use automated systems for compliance need to have robust testing and auditing mechanisms in place. Regulators expect banks to conduct periodic reviews and stress tests of their monitoring systems to identify and rectify any weaknesses promptly. Automated systems are not fool proof, and over-reliance on them without adequate oversight and calibration could leave banks exposed to serious risks.
Conclusion
The £29 million fine imposed on Starling Bank is a reminder that even the most successful and innovative digital banks are not immune to compliance challenges. In Starling’s case, the deficiencies in AML and CTF measures, as well as the apparent gaps in governance, point to a broader issue that is not exclusive to one bank or type of institution. For other financial institutions, the key takeaways are clear. Innovation in banking cannot come at the cost of fundamental regulatory responsibilities. A strong compliance culture, adequately resourced and skilled teams, robust transaction monitoring systems, and active engagement with regulators are essential pillars in maintaining a secure and compliant financial environment.
In the competitive landscape of digital banking, the emphasis should not only be on achieving rapid growth or technological sophistication but also on building a strong and scalable compliance framework. Starling Bank’s case serves as a wake-up call, reinforcing the idea that compliance is not an afterthought—it is a fundamental aspect of sustainable banking growth.
Our Customer Lifecycle Management SaaS Platform takes care of all aspects, from creating the right first impression with rapid risk-based onboarding, through to award winning screening and KYC refresh that enable your business to:
- Realise massive operational efficiencies
- Achieve rapid ROI through the speedy deployment of our no code solutions
- Master complexity with solutions that evolve as regulations change
All at the same time as delivering even higher levels of compliance assurance.
