Know Your Buyer: Governments act against money laundering in real estate
27 Nov 2018

A longtime favorite vehicle for money launderers, real estate as a means of hiding illicit proceeds has gained the renewed attention of regulators and legislators throughout the world.

Real estate was an $8.5 trillion market in 2017, which warrants regulatory scrutiny and enhanced transparency for an industry exposed to the downstream risks of criminal activity.

The primary money laundering risk for the real estate industry is lack of transparency, specifically with regards to cash transactions and purchases by ever-problematic shell companies.

Residual effects of real property purchased with illegal funds include artificial real estate market inflation and higher costs of living, especially in dense urban areas. It seems that some governments are taking notice, and action, in some potentially meaningful ways:

  • Starting in the United States, the world’s largest real estate market, the success of Geographic Targeting Orders in reducing the volume of cash-for-property transactions has led to FinCEN extending and expanding the program to nine major geographic areas in November 2018. Unsurprisingly, real estate-related SARS in the US increased by over 300 percent from 2013 to 2017 and are on pace to increase again in 2018 due to enhanced regulatory focus.
  • Moving north to Canada, multiple embarrassing money laundering incidents in British Columbia have moved provincial officials to set up a registry that will collect ownership information on new condominium developments and attempt to remediate past suspicious real estate transactions.The initiative, starting January 1, 2019 is aimed in part at curbing the costs of living in the province’s largest city, which ranks as the least affordable real estate market in North America. Many blame the post-2008 financial crisis influx of foreign, shell company, and criminal proceeds purchases of commercial and residential properties for the over-inflated market, and this initial step towards transparency may provide relief long-term for the high cost of living for Vancouver area residents.
  • Germany’s anti-money laundering authority has intimated that it will seek harsher penalties for banks and brokers that enable criminals to purchase property in the world’s fourth largest real estate market. The Financial Intelligence Unit is seeking increased transactional oversight, including real estate deals that are attempted but not completed.
  • Singapore’s Parliament passed the Developers (Anti-Money Laundering and Terrorism Financing) Bill in November 2018. The bill will compel developers and related transactional parties to implement money laundering controls and produce relevant documentation for law enforcement investigations. It also limits the ability of real estate firms to make deals with shell and shelf entities that lack a reasonable source of funds or possess ambiguous beneficial owners.
  • Finally, the United Kingdom may have made the most significant steps towards fighting laundering in real estate despite its reputation as a hub for illicit money. The Unexplained Wealth Order (UWO) was incorporated into UK law in January 2018 as part of the Criminal Finances Act 2017.It is a court order issued to compel someone to reveal the sources of their unexplained wealth related to assets that are worth more than £50,000.UWO provides regulators and law enforcement more tools to combat tax evasion, money laundering, and terrorism financing.Parliament is also working on legislation that would create a public register of foreign entities that own property in the U.K. and would require listing details of beneficial ownership. This register would likely compliment the country’s registry of companies, Companies House, which completed its first successful prosecution for false company information in March 2018, a step in the right direction for transparency.

The basic AML principles of KYC, identifying legitimate business purpose, and conducting due diligence before the transaction don’t just apply to banks anymore.

As regulatory and legal initiatives grow to incorporate more facets of the financial crimes process, solid compliance programs will continue to become a critical concern for developers, realtors, and facilitating companies.

Specifically, knowing your buyer will eventually mean more than some basic paperwork and the proverbial bag of cash.

About the Author:  Michael Carter is a Senior Director at Alvarez & Marsal, and an expert consultant in the area of financial crime which includes anti-money laundering, sanctions programs, export compliance, and counter terrorism financing.

Read more:

UK property register: Secret buyers of properties face jail

Societe Generale fined $1.3 billion for sanctions, anti-money laundering violations

HSBC compliance exec under investigation by UK regulator

Advance your CPD minutes for reading this article, by signing up and using the CPD Wallet

FREE CPD Wallet
Must Read

Bearing witness to financial crime, across party lines

If it seems like an odd recipe for financial oversight, it’s also a surprisingly effective one: take five to ten congressional staffers, exile them to a squalid basement office with “hard-boiled” charm in the U.S. Senate’s oldest building, give them access to subpoena powers and a seemingly endless series of… Read More

Anti-money laundering analysis: UK FCA and EU blacklists update

A key element in the application of the risk-based approach (RBA) to financial crime is the identification by a firm of those countries with which its customers are closely linked and which are also adjudged to be high risk in financial crime terms. There are many lists of such high-risk… Read More